Main Section
Friday
Sep022011

Purtan Podcast #7: The Return of Big Al

Happy Labor Day Weekend!  On this week’s Podcast Jackie and I welcome Big Al back after a brief hiatus. (Despite rumors to the contrary, he wasn’t off auditioning for the upcoming season of “Survivor: Zug Island”).

We also enjoy a surprise visit from “The Queen” and we discuss the exciting new scientific research into the manufature of bio-fuel using Panda Poop.  (True!)  Also in the mix… a new study confirming the heart health advantages of chocolate and an in-depth discussion about a very “painful” injury suffered by Al!  

Just click, and as they say at your local eatery… “Enjoy!” 

Purtan Podcast #7  (23 min. 25 sec.)

 

Dick enjoying the weather and a good book under his Marygrove Awning!

« Today's Almanac | Main | Better "Chicken" Than Frankenmuth! »

Reader Comments (8)

Dick,
Do you need a good slip & fall guy? Call me.

September 2, 2011 | Unregistered Commentersam bernstein

Dick,
I wondered how all that carmel got on my white carpet?

September 2, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterrick

Love the Podcast! Great to hear your voice again. Will we see your face at the MDA Telethon on Sunday?

September 2, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterDiane

Hi Dick,
Interesting story about your new favorite chocolate covered candy.
And of course Al and Jackie immediately tied it in with the 'panda poop' story.
Was wondering if the new candy might be called 'Reeses Feces'.

September 2, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterDennis Mitchell

So great to hear and "see" you, again. There is NOTHING like the original radio stars Detroit has loved for years!!

Barb

September 3, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterBarb

So great to hear and "see" the original radio starts Detroit has loved for so long!!

September 3, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterBarb

Nobody on the radio even comes CLOSE to the greatness of all of you!
You are all missed so much. Thank you for doing your podcasts for all of your
still-dedicated fans!

September 3, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRose

It does not follow that because we do not subsidize smoking, we should not regulate unhealthy activities. Costs and savings are not the only variable. The fact that obesity creates costs is merely an additional reason to regulate it, not the only one. The main reason is its danger to an individual. You are dismissive of subsidizing smoking precisely because of this moral intuition. bqcmym bqcmym - Belstaff Coat.

December 22, 2011 | Unregistered Commentersbqzss sbqzss

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>